The Yankee Clause
Via The Chicago Tribune:
“Give the Red Sox credit for taking no chances. Their $142 million deal with Carl Crawford includes a clause that prohibits any team he’s traded to from then trading him to the Yankees. They rarely give no-trade clauses, and in Crawford’s case allowed him to block trades to only two teams.”
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I feel confident that something like this has never happened before, and is probably impossible to enforce. Can a contract really stipulate what one team can do with a player once they’re on the payroll?
Still, any team that ever wants to trade with the Red Sox in the future would be wise to heed their warning, and not begin baseball’s version of a nuclear holocaust.
-
oldtimefamilybaseball reblogged this from tealandblackforever
-
hellowsomewhereelse reblogged this from oldtimefamilybaseball
-
baseballnyc reblogged this from sportsnetny
-
joshsternberg liked this
-
itssotrue liked this
-
tealandblackforever reblogged this from sportscentr and added:
Chicago Tribune is inaccurate, says Alex Speier...WEEI.com. No such
-
alphaq06 liked this
-
michaelclair liked this
-
sportscentr reblogged this from oldtimefamilybaseball and added:
I don’t remember any precedent for this in baseball, but when the Packers traded Brett Favre, they included a “poison...
-
sportsnetny reblogged this from oldtimefamilybaseball
-
phazerblast liked this
-
sophiamaria liked this
-
oldtimefamilybaseball posted this
Daily news, recaps, and ridiculous pictures from across the baseball world. Extra focus on stirrup socks, squeeze bunts, mustaches and old baseball cards. In other words, your exact interests.
Questions and comments? Email me: oldtimefamilybaseball@gmail.com
